Disputes about trade war anti-dumping in recent years, major Chinese tile playback.

<p> <em> since February 5, 2003 onwards, all tile products from China, collected $ 8.28 / square meters of the anti-dumping duties. .The final ruling: April 18, 2006, Korea Trade Commission make a final, not responding to the 13 Chinese companies involved in exports of ceramic tiles imposed a period of 5 years of anti-dumping tax rate from 2.67% to 29.41%. .</ Em> </ p> <p> recent years, China's ceramic tile in the anti-dumping investigations abroad, the major event playback: </ p> <p> 1, India, unglazed ceramic tile </ p> <p> filing: 2001 .on August 6, the Indian companies to initiate an investigation of Chinese ceramics, ceramic tile pieces against Chinese anti-dumping duties levied on products, involving tax ID 6907/6914. .</ P> <P> <P> <p> final ruling: In the absence of any Chinese enterprises to participate in responding to, investigating authorities in India in February 2003 the final determination, since February 5, 2003 onwards, from China .charge $ 8.28 for all tile products / square meter of the anti-dumping duties. ."</ P> <p> sunset review of the final ruling: May 22, 2008, Indian Commerce and Industry Bureau issued anti-dumping anti-dumping on Chinese tile sunset review final results of the survey. .Final ruling, in the past five cases from the new shipper review to gain market economy treatment in the European Union building ceramics in Foshan Chancheng Company (producer) and the United Arab Emirates Prestige Trading Company (Exporter), Heyuan Wan Feng Ceramic Company (producer) and .Long Ceramics Co., Ltd. Foshan high (exporters), Qingyuan City Southern Building Materials Company (producer) and new source of Guangdong Import and Export Corporation, Guangdong New Pearl Ceramics Corporation (manufacturer) and Foshan New Pearl Trading Company (Exporters .), Foshan Chancheng Jin Yi Ceramic Company (producer) and Jayson ceramics company in Foshan (exporters) and other five production / exporter combinations (a total of five manufacturing companies in China, 4 Chinese export enterprises) continued to gain market economy status .treatment, and was found not constitute dumping; other Chinese companies were found dumping, dumping margin of 150-200%. .Final ruling found that the survey period the rapid increase in China and India tiles, printed ceramic tiles industry, result in reduced market share, prices and falling profits, to cause substantial damage to the Indian tile industry. .Final ruling on the above five proposed production / exporters of Chinese products outside combination of anti-dumping duties of Rs 155 / square meter. .</ P> <p> new shipper review of the final ruling: February 27, 2009, India tiles of Chinese origin make the final ruling of anti-dumping new shipper review: the Mona Lisa from Guangdong Ceramics Co., Ltd. (Guangdong .Monalisa Ceramic Co., Ltd., China PR) and Foshan Mona Lisa Industries (Foshan Monalisa Industry Co., Ltd., China PR) involved in exports to India, the export price is higher than the normal value, so does the Guangdong Meng .Nali Sha Ceramics Co., Ltd. (Guangdong Monalisa Ceramic Co., Ltd., China PR) and Foshan Mona Lisa Industries (Foshan Monalisa Industry Co., Ltd., China PR) involved in the export of anti-dumping duties levied on products. .The products involved customs codes for 6907,6914,6908. .</ P> <p> 2, Korea, glazed and unglazed ceramic tile </ p> <p> filing: May 16, 2005, Korean Trade Commission sent a letter to my embassy Jingshangcanchu Korea, saying that was 4 .accepted 30 January Dae Kong Ind.Co.Ltd other four proposed for the origin of domestic enterprises from China's anti-dumping investigation tile applications. .Domestic enterprises were sampled 9 ceramics. .According to my customs data show that in 2004 the cases of export to South Korea amounted to $ 58,660,000 products. .Products involved the application of the customs tariff in Korea was 6907101000,6907109000,6907901000,6907909000,6908101000,6908109000,6908901000,6908909000. .</ P> <p> preliminary ruling: December 2005, Korean Trade Commission made the preliminary ruling, found my business tax rate of 7.25% -37.4%, respectively. .</ P> <p> final ruling: April 18, 2006, Korean Trade Commission make a final, not responding to the 13 Chinese companies involved in exports of ceramic tiles imposed a period of 5 years of anti-dumping tax rate from 2.67% increase .to 29.41%. .The respondent or active enterprises involved in the lowest tax rate is 2.76%, up to 7.49%, other non-sampled companies are enjoying the weighted average tax rate of 13.3%, it named sample but were not involved in responding to business class to 29.41% .The high tax rate. .(2.76% ceramic Hao Wang, Eagle Brand Holdings 3.51%, 3.97% South China Sea, Tao Wang, Double Happiness Ceramic 4.21%, the new source 4.64%, 7.21% combined US-ceramics, the new defender 7.21%, 7.49% of gold per Tao, Asia 29.41% .Other companies 13.33%). .</ P> <p> 3, Pakistan, glazed and unglazed ceramic tile </ p> <p> filing: March 27, 2006, Pakistan National Tariff Commission issued a notice of my tiles (Customs number: 69071000,69079000 ., 69081000,69089000) initiated anti-dumping investigation, which is Pakistan to me for the first time since 2005, anti-dumping investigations initiated since the second anti-dumping cases. .</ P> <p> preliminary ruling: November 30, 2006, Pakistan National Tariff Commission made a preliminary ruling, a preliminary ruling from the Chinese of dumping and damage to the establishment of tile products, the implementation of a 4-month temporary anti-dumping measures, in addition to .Hardware Equipment Import and Export Corporation of China, the other being drawn in the investigation found the company's products were 3.79% -21.02% levy provisional anti-dumping duties, including Foshan enterprises involved in the tax rates were: new source of 3.79%, 4.86% higher Lang ., 7.55% Fort St, Ascot 15.25%, 19.34% out of the South China Sea Light, Jiayi 21.02% corporate tax rate is not responding to 21.02%. .</ P> <p> final ruling: March 30, 2007, Tariff Commission of Pakistan announced the tiles originating in China, the Final Determination of anti-dumping investigation, decided November 30, 2006, the collection of the product .rate of 14.85% ~ 23.65% anti-dumping duties ranging from a period of five years, of which Royal Ascot Industrial Co., Ltd. Foshan City, 14.85%, J & M Graphics, 16.46%, Nanhai Light Industrial Products Import & Export Co., Ltd. Guangdong Province, 21.08%, New .source, Ranga, St. Fort and Equipment Import and Export Corporation China National Metals and other companies apply the average rate of 23.65%. .</ P> <p> 4, India glazed </ p> <p> filing: October 17, 2008, should H & R Jonson (India) Ltd. And Kajaria Ceramics Ltd. The application of Commerce and Industry of India .tiles of Chinese origin anti-dumping investigation. .The products involved customs codes for 69089090. .The case of the dumping investigation period is April 1, 2007 ~ March 31, 2008. .In this case, the Indian Commerce and Industry in order to structure the calculation of normal value of the normal value of Chinese products involved. .</ P> <p> preliminary ruling: April 22, 2009, Indian Commerce and Industry Bureau of Anti-dumping on China to make ceramic tiles (Ceramic Tiles) preliminary anti-dumping investigation. .Anti-dumping investigations in the past to gain market economy treatment in the new source of ceramic tile company in Foshan and other 4 enterprises (Foshan Bailifeng Building Materials Co., Ltd., Sichuan New Zhongyuan tiles Co., Ltd., Guangdong Hongyu Ceramics Co., Ltd., Foshan Sanshui New Pearl Building Ceramics Co. .Company or Foshan Summit Ceramic Co., Ltd.) continues to gain market economy treatment, and was found not constitute dumping. .For other Chinese companies, preliminary to the production costs of the domestic industry in India is calculated on the basis of normal value of their products, confirmed to constitute dumping and material injury caused by printing the domestic industry, the proposed levy of Rs 137 / square-meter temporary anti-dumping duties. .</ P> <p> final ruling: October 9, 2009, and preliminary results are basically consistent. .</ P> <p> 5, Thailand, glazed and unglazed ceramic tile </ p> <p> filing: December 3, 2009, Thailand, China formally opened ceramic anti-dumping on Chinese exports to Thailand of all glazed .and unglazed tiles are anti-dumping investigation, dumping investigation period is October 1, 2008 ~ September 30, 2009. .Most of Foshan ceramic enterprises involved in exports of Thailand, the number of up to hundred. .According to statistics, in October 2008 ~ September 2009, the amount of Foshan ceramic tile products exported to Thailand more than 5,000 million U.S. dollars, equivalent to 4.3 billion yuan. .</ P>.